<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 411 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the condonation of delay in filing the appeal, disallowance of brand license fee, and disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D for the assessment year 2014-15. The Tribunal affirmed that the brand license fee should be treated as revenue expenditure and that in a year without exempt income, there cannot be a disallowance of expenditure related to assumed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 411 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the condonation of delay in filing the appeal, disallowance of brand license fee, and disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D for the assessment year 2014-15. The Tribunal affirmed that the brand license fee should be treated as revenue expenditure and that in a year without exempt income, there cannot be a disallowance of expenditure related to assumed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>