<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 399 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377955</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision to impose a penalty of forfeiture of security and Rs. 50,000 on the CB holder, dismissing the appeal by the Customs Authorities. The judgment emphasized the limitations of imposing unrealistic expectations on CB holders and the need to consider their role as independent agents facilitating customs processes without being public servants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 06:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 399 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377955</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision to impose a penalty of forfeiture of security and Rs. 50,000 on the CB holder, dismissing the appeal by the Customs Authorities. The judgment emphasized the limitations of imposing unrealistic expectations on CB holders and the need to consider their role as independent agents facilitating customs processes without being public servants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>