<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 394 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377950</link>
    <description>Wilful default under the RBI Master Circular may be assessed contextually and is not limited to a narrow lender-borrower situation where funds are physically credited into the borrower&#039;s account. The Court held that liability arising from the bank&#039;s payment to foreign suppliers under a letter of credit created an enforceable credit obligation, and the petitioners&#039; failure to repay, along with withdrawal of equity funds without consent, justified classification as wilful defaulters. It further held that the circular&#039;s personal hearing does not include a right to be represented by an advocate or chartered accountant, and that review by the internal committee is a safeguard, not an appellate hearing requiring fresh reasons. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 09:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 394 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377950</link>
      <description>Wilful default under the RBI Master Circular may be assessed contextually and is not limited to a narrow lender-borrower situation where funds are physically credited into the borrower&#039;s account. The Court held that liability arising from the bank&#039;s payment to foreign suppliers under a letter of credit created an enforceable credit obligation, and the petitioners&#039; failure to repay, along with withdrawal of equity funds without consent, justified classification as wilful defaulters. It further held that the circular&#039;s personal hearing does not include a right to be represented by an advocate or chartered accountant, and that review by the internal committee is a safeguard, not an appellate hearing requiring fresh reasons. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>