https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377949 The appeal against the rejection of the application for restoration of the company name under section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 was dismissed by the National Company Law Tribunal. Despite arguments of ongoing operations and inadvertent omissions, the appellant failed to provide sufficient justification and documentation for restoration. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of essential details and repeated non-compliance over several years, leading to doubts about the company's status. The appeal was dismissed, except for expunging the characterization of the company as a shell company due to insufficient evidence demonstrating ongoing business activities. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Apr 2019 15:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377949 The appeal against the rejection of the application for restoration of the company name under section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 was dismissed by the National Company Law Tribunal. Despite arguments of ongoing operations and inadvertent omissions, the appellant failed to provide sufficient justification and documentation for restoration. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of essential details and repeated non-compliance over several years, leading to doubts about the company's status. The appeal was dismissed, except for expunging the characterization of the company as a shell company due to insufficient evidence demonstrating ongoing business activities. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377949