https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279796 The court held that the application for execution of an award under the Hyderabad Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1956 was timely filed within three years of registration in 1961, applying the new Limitation Act, 1963. The award was considered distinct from a decree of a Civil Court, to be executed under the Act's provisions, not the Civil Procedure Code. The absence of a deeming provision in the Act reinforced this distinction from cases under other statutes. Procedural provisions of the Civil Procedure Code were found applicable, but the final adjudication by the Debt Court did not qualify as a decree. en-us Wed, 19 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 05:57:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279796 The court held that the application for execution of an award under the Hyderabad Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1956 was timely filed within three years of registration in 1961, applying the new Limitation Act, 1963. The award was considered distinct from a decree of a Civil Court, to be executed under the Act's provisions, not the Civil Procedure Code. The absence of a deeming provision in the Act reinforced this distinction from cases under other statutes. Procedural provisions of the Civil Procedure Code were found applicable, but the final adjudication by the Debt Court did not qualify as a decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279796