<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1184 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279804</link>
    <description>The Court overturned penalties imposed on a company and its directors for failing to realize export proceeds, finding them not in contravention of FERA. It determined the company, not MMTC, as the actual exporter and recognized their efforts to recover proceeds. Emphasizing the challenges faced by exporters, the Court ruled in favor of the company and directors, ordering refunds of deposited amounts due to their genuine attempts to comply with FERA regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 05:57:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1184 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279804</link>
      <description>The Court overturned penalties imposed on a company and its directors for failing to realize export proceeds, finding them not in contravention of FERA. It determined the company, not MMTC, as the actual exporter and recognized their efforts to recover proceeds. Emphasizing the challenges faced by exporters, the Court ruled in favor of the company and directors, ordering refunds of deposited amounts due to their genuine attempts to comply with FERA regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>