<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 389 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377945</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the CIT(A) and held that notional income from unsold flats held as stock-in-trade should be assessed under the head &#039;business income&#039; and not &#039;income from house property&#039;. The decision emphasized the significance of judicial precedents and the specific circumstances under which properties are held and utilized by the assessee in determining the appropriate head of income for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 389 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377945</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the CIT(A) and held that notional income from unsold flats held as stock-in-trade should be assessed under the head &#039;business income&#039; and not &#039;income from house property&#039;. The decision emphasized the significance of judicial precedents and the specific circumstances under which properties are held and utilized by the assessee in determining the appropriate head of income for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>