https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377944 The Tribunal held that the assessment orders passed by the Assessing Officers (AOs) were invalid as they extended scrutiny beyond the Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS) issues without obtaining necessary approvals. The Tribunal found the assessment orders to be void-ab initio due to the lack of required administrative approvals for extending the scope of scrutiny. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees on this preliminary issue, dismissing other grounds as academic. All ten appeals were partly allowed, with the decision pronounced on 08th February 2019. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Apr 2019 15:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377944 The Tribunal held that the assessment orders passed by the Assessing Officers (AOs) were invalid as they extended scrutiny beyond the Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS) issues without obtaining necessary approvals. The Tribunal found the assessment orders to be void-ab initio due to the lack of required administrative approvals for extending the scope of scrutiny. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees on this preliminary issue, dismissing other grounds as academic. All ten appeals were partly allowed, with the decision pronounced on 08th February 2019. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377944