<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 814 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279787</link>
    <description>The Court found the suit maintainable under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act for considering the dissolution of an undissolved firm and accounting. It held that exceptions under Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act, 1932, apply to arbitration proceedings. As the suit sought arbitration for firm dissolution and accounting, falling under exception (a) of Section 69(3), the Court dismissed the petition, citing no legal error in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 814 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279787</link>
      <description>The Court found the suit maintainable under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act for considering the dissolution of an undissolved firm and accounting. It held that exceptions under Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act, 1932, apply to arbitration proceedings. As the suit sought arbitration for firm dissolution and accounting, falling under exception (a) of Section 69(3), the Court dismissed the petition, citing no legal error in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>