https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279786 The Supreme Court held that Section 428 of the CrPC does not apply to individuals sentenced by Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act, and Air Force Act. The Court rejected conflicting views from different High Courts and affirmed that special laws like the Army Act prevail over the CrPC in governing trial and sentencing procedures. The appeals were dismissed, upholding that the benefit of Section 428 of the CrPC cannot be claimed by those tried and sentenced by Court-Martial, based on a comprehensive legal analysis. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Apr 2019 09:54:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279786 The Supreme Court held that Section 428 of the CrPC does not apply to individuals sentenced by Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act, and Air Force Act. The Court rejected conflicting views from different High Courts and affirmed that special laws like the Army Act prevail over the CrPC in governing trial and sentencing procedures. The appeals were dismissed, upholding that the benefit of Section 428 of the CrPC cannot be claimed by those tried and sentenced by Court-Martial, based on a comprehensive legal analysis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279786