https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377941 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was used to seek release of confiscated goods under the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act after deposit of tax and penalty. The HC did not examine the merits of the confiscation; it noted that the petitioner's representation dated 13.3.2019 for release of the goods was still pending. The Court directed respondent No. 2 to decide that representation in accordance with law by passing a speaking order and after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, within one week from receipt of the certified copy of the order. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Mar 2025 16:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377941 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was used to seek release of confiscated goods under the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act after deposit of tax and penalty. The HC did not examine the merits of the confiscation; it noted that the petitioner's representation dated 13.3.2019 for release of the goods was still pending. The Court directed respondent No. 2 to decide that representation in accordance with law by passing a speaking order and after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, within one week from receipt of the certified copy of the order. Case-Laws GST Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377941