https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377936 The case involved an allegation of profiteering post-GST implementation on 'Gypsum Board'. The DGAP's report confirmed no tax rate reduction, leading to dismissal of the application under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The Authority's decision was based on the absence of a tax rate decrease, making the profiteering claim unsustainable. The case was concluded with the order to share the decision with relevant parties. en-us Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Apr 2019 09:02:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377936 The case involved an allegation of profiteering post-GST implementation on 'Gypsum Board'. The DGAP's report confirmed no tax rate reduction, leading to dismissal of the application under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The Authority's decision was based on the absence of a tax rate decrease, making the profiteering claim unsustainable. The case was concluded with the order to share the decision with relevant parties. Case-Laws GST Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377936