<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 357 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the notice issued under Section 148 and the assessment completed pursuant to such notice. It held that the reopening of assessment for verification purposes is not permissible and that the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction was based on borrowed satisfaction without independent application of mind. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the assessment order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 357 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the notice issued under Section 148 and the assessment completed pursuant to such notice. It held that the reopening of assessment for verification purposes is not permissible and that the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction was based on borrowed satisfaction without independent application of mind. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the assessment order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>