<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 345 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377901</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s judgment addressed various issues raised by the assessee and Revenue, resulting in the deletion of certain additions and remanding some issues back to the Assessing Officer for further verification. The Tribunal concluded that advances made by companies in which the assessee had substantial interest were not deemed dividends, cash credit discrepancies required further substantiation, expenses without TDS deduction needed verification, unexplained expenditures warranted additional evidence review, sundry creditors&#039; additions needed reevaluation, and penalties for unexplained credits and creditors were deleted due to remand for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 345 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377901</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s judgment addressed various issues raised by the assessee and Revenue, resulting in the deletion of certain additions and remanding some issues back to the Assessing Officer for further verification. The Tribunal concluded that advances made by companies in which the assessee had substantial interest were not deemed dividends, cash credit discrepancies required further substantiation, expenses without TDS deduction needed verification, unexplained expenditures warranted additional evidence review, sundry creditors&#039; additions needed reevaluation, and penalties for unexplained credits and creditors were deleted due to remand for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>