https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377900 Importability of peas had to be assessed under the Foreign Trade Policy in force on the date of shipment, and the earlier restriction remained operative despite a later notification withdrawing an extension of that restriction. Because paragraph 1.05(b) of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-2020 tied legality to the policy prevailing at the time of import or shipment, the consignment shipped on 28 August 2018 was subject to the then-existing restriction and could not be treated as freely importable without a special import licence. The challenge to the customs and DGFT action therefore failed, and clearance as unrestricted goods was denied. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377900 Importability of peas had to be assessed under the Foreign Trade Policy in force on the date of shipment, and the earlier restriction remained operative despite a later notification withdrawing an extension of that restriction. Because paragraph 1.05(b) of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-2020 tied legality to the policy prevailing at the time of import or shipment, the consignment shipped on 28 August 2018 was subject to the then-existing restriction and could not be treated as freely importable without a special import licence. The challenge to the customs and DGFT action therefore failed, and clearance as unrestricted goods was denied. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377900