https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377900 The court upheld the validity of Notifications No. 32/2015-2020 and No. 37/2015-2020 imposing restrictions on pea imports, stating they were in the public interest to protect domestic farmers. It affirmed the requirement for a Special Import Licence and ruled that transitional provisions of the Foreign Trade Policy did not apply as the import restriction was continuous. The court emphasized that policy decisions were lawful under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the notifications. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377900 The court upheld the validity of Notifications No. 32/2015-2020 and No. 37/2015-2020 imposing restrictions on pea imports, stating they were in the public interest to protect domestic farmers. It affirmed the requirement for a Special Import Licence and ruled that transitional provisions of the Foreign Trade Policy did not apply as the import restriction was continuous. The court emphasized that policy decisions were lawful under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the notifications. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377900