https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377899 Under the Foreign Trade Policy, the relevant date for testing import restrictions was the Bill of Lading date, not the Bill of Entry date, because Regulation 9.11 treated shipment as the controlling reference point for import-related rights. The Court noted that later restrictive notifications could not retrospectively defeat consignments already shipped when the protective stay was in force, so the peas and dhalls were not liable to be denied clearance on that basis and were ordered to be released on the stated conditions. It also held that demurrage had to be waived because the goods had been detained by customs, bringing Regulation 6(1)(l) of the 2009 Cargo Handling Regulations into operation. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Apr 2019 08:48:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377899 Under the Foreign Trade Policy, the relevant date for testing import restrictions was the Bill of Lading date, not the Bill of Entry date, because Regulation 9.11 treated shipment as the controlling reference point for import-related rights. The Court noted that later restrictive notifications could not retrospectively defeat consignments already shipped when the protective stay was in force, so the peas and dhalls were not liable to be denied clearance on that basis and were ordered to be released on the stated conditions. It also held that demurrage had to be waived because the goods had been detained by customs, bringing Regulation 6(1)(l) of the 2009 Cargo Handling Regulations into operation. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377899