<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 342 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377898</link>
    <description>Revenue appeals under the Customs Act were found barred by limitation because compliance with the prescribed statutory time limits was not established. The burden rested on the Department to prove that the review orders and appeals were filed within time, and the fact-finding authorities recorded that the relevant dates could not be authenticated and the delay was not condonable. On those concurrent findings, no fresh factual enquiry or re-appreciation was permissible in second appeal under Section 130, and no substantial question of law arose. The limitation objection therefore stood and the appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 342 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377898</link>
      <description>Revenue appeals under the Customs Act were found barred by limitation because compliance with the prescribed statutory time limits was not established. The burden rested on the Department to prove that the review orders and appeals were filed within time, and the fact-finding authorities recorded that the relevant dates could not be authenticated and the delay was not condonable. On those concurrent findings, no fresh factual enquiry or re-appreciation was permissible in second appeal under Section 130, and no substantial question of law arose. The limitation objection therefore stood and the appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>