<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1587 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279783</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the respondent Bank to proceed without interference, emphasizing the distinction between different High Court rulings on the necessity of legal representation in financial institution proceedings. The decision highlighted the importance of legal precedent and case-specific circumstances in determining the need for representation through a Lawyer/Chartered Accountant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 08:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1587 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279783</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the respondent Bank to proceed without interference, emphasizing the distinction between different High Court rulings on the necessity of legal representation in financial institution proceedings. The decision highlighted the importance of legal precedent and case-specific circumstances in determining the need for representation through a Lawyer/Chartered Accountant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>