<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 336 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377892</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter to the original adjudicating authority for a decision on the request letter dated 30th July 2008, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles and timely disposal of the matter. The case involved an appeal against the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s decision to delete CVD payment endorsement on DFIA licenses, highlighting procedural fairness and cooperation among parties for expeditious resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 336 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377892</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter to the original adjudicating authority for a decision on the request letter dated 30th July 2008, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles and timely disposal of the matter. The case involved an appeal against the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s decision to delete CVD payment endorsement on DFIA licenses, highlighting procedural fairness and cooperation among parties for expeditious resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>