https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377890 The Court partially allowed the application for the recall of the order dated 5th May, 2017, due to errors in the possession process. It emphasized adherence to legal procedures outlined in the Companies Act for the Official Liquidator's actions. Despite acknowledging the Official Liquidator's possession through an ex parte order, the Court did not grant restoration of possession to the applicant, citing voluntary relinquishment of possession in the past. The judgment underscored the importance of proper adjudication of possession rights and adherence to due process in such cases. en-us Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Apr 2019 07:22:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377890 The Court partially allowed the application for the recall of the order dated 5th May, 2017, due to errors in the possession process. It emphasized adherence to legal procedures outlined in the Companies Act for the Official Liquidator's actions. Despite acknowledging the Official Liquidator's possession through an ex parte order, the Court did not grant restoration of possession to the applicant, citing voluntary relinquishment of possession in the past. The judgment underscored the importance of proper adjudication of possession rights and adherence to due process in such cases. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377890