<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 323 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding that the main appellant was eligible for SSI exemption for their Rohad unit under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, despite not availing it for other units. The Tribunal held that the combined turnover of all units was not a mandatory condition for exemption eligibility. Consequently, penalties imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, were reversed, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the SSI Exemption Notification in cases involving multiple manufacturing units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 07:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 323 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding that the main appellant was eligible for SSI exemption for their Rohad unit under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, despite not availing it for other units. The Tribunal held that the combined turnover of all units was not a mandatory condition for exemption eligibility. Consequently, penalties imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, were reversed, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the SSI Exemption Notification in cases involving multiple manufacturing units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>