<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 322 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377878</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed by the Member (Technical), upholding the demand, interest, and penalties. In contrast, the Member (Judicial) allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands and penalties. The points of difference were referred for resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 07:06:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 322 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377878</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed by the Member (Technical), upholding the demand, interest, and penalties. In contrast, the Member (Judicial) allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands and penalties. The points of difference were referred for resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>