https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377875 The court granted an ad interim order in favor of the Petitioner, a registered dealer in Uttarakhand, regarding the cancellation of Form F by the VAT Commissioner in Delhi. The court found that the cancellation raised concerns about potential CST liabilities and that the forms were valid and verified before submission. The court also interpreted Rule 8 (10) of the CST Delhi Rules, highlighting that the power to declare forms obsolete applied to unused forms of specific series. The Petitioner's challenge to the ultra vires nature of Rule 8 (10) was considered, leading to the issuance of the ad interim order staying the impugned notification until the next hearing. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Apr 2019 06:46:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377875 The court granted an ad interim order in favor of the Petitioner, a registered dealer in Uttarakhand, regarding the cancellation of Form F by the VAT Commissioner in Delhi. The court found that the cancellation raised concerns about potential CST liabilities and that the forms were valid and verified before submission. The court also interpreted Rule 8 (10) of the CST Delhi Rules, highlighting that the power to declare forms obsolete applied to unused forms of specific series. The Petitioner's challenge to the ultra vires nature of Rule 8 (10) was considered, leading to the issuance of the ad interim order staying the impugned notification until the next hearing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377875