<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 43 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17564</link>
    <description>Depreciation under section 32 is allowable where the assessee has paid full consideration, taken possession, and exercises dominion and control over the property in its own right. Legal title need not be fully registered if the assessee is in exclusive enjoyment as owner and the asset is used for business. A transferee in possession under an executed bargain may be treated as the owner for depreciation purposes. On these facts, depreciation was held allowable and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 43 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17564</link>
      <description>Depreciation under section 32 is allowable where the assessee has paid full consideration, taken possession, and exercises dominion and control over the property in its own right. Legal title need not be fully registered if the assessee is in exclusive enjoyment as owner and the asset is used for business. A transferee in possession under an executed bargain may be treated as the owner for depreciation purposes. On these facts, depreciation was held allowable and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>