https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377872 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the respondent's entitlement to gratuity under the amended definition of "employee" in the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court emphasized that the retrospective amendment nullified the earlier precedent and extended gratuity benefits to teachers. The appellant was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to the respondent. The pending challenge to the constitutional validity of the amendment did not affect the respondent's right to gratuity. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 May 2022 18:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377872 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the respondent's entitlement to gratuity under the amended definition of "employee" in the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court emphasized that the retrospective amendment nullified the earlier precedent and extended gratuity benefits to teachers. The appellant was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to the respondent. The pending challenge to the constitutional validity of the amendment did not affect the respondent's right to gratuity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377872