<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 518 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279767</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals to a certain extent, permitting arbitration for items falling within the exceptions of Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act while restricting arbitration for issues originating solely from the partnership contract. The judgment clarified the scope of entitlement to arbitration in cases of unregistered partnership firms and provided a detailed analysis of the exceptions under the Partnership Act for enforcing rights arising from such contracts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 18:26:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 518 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279767</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals to a certain extent, permitting arbitration for items falling within the exceptions of Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act while restricting arbitration for issues originating solely from the partnership contract. The judgment clarified the scope of entitlement to arbitration in cases of unregistered partnership firms and provided a detailed analysis of the exceptions under the Partnership Act for enforcing rights arising from such contracts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>