https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279759 The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of offences under Sections 46B, 411, and 420 read with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court found the evidence insufficient to sustain the conviction, highlighting the unreliable handwriting expert testimony and questionable identification of the appellant at the scene. Criticizing the police investigation's inefficacy in tracing key individuals, the Court set aside the conviction and emphasized the importance of substantial corroboration of expert testimony. en-us Tue, 15 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Apr 2019 13:22:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279759 The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of offences under Sections 46B, 411, and 420 read with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court found the evidence insufficient to sustain the conviction, highlighting the unreliable handwriting expert testimony and questionable identification of the appellant at the scene. Criticizing the police investigation's inefficacy in tracing key individuals, the Court set aside the conviction and emphasized the importance of substantial corroboration of expert testimony. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279759