https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279753 The court modified the decree by striking out the provision for future payments by the receiver in another suit and confined defendant 6's rights to redeeming the plaintiffs' mortgage and receiving any balance from the sale proceeds. The court emphasized that orders directing payments by receivers in other suits should not be made without proper jurisdiction and all relevant parties being before the Court. The Official Assignee's appeal was partially upheld, and costs were awarded accordingly. en-us Sun, 31 Aug 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:00:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279753 The court modified the decree by striking out the provision for future payments by the receiver in another suit and confined defendant 6's rights to redeeming the plaintiffs' mortgage and receiving any balance from the sale proceeds. The court emphasized that orders directing payments by receivers in other suits should not be made without proper jurisdiction and all relevant parties being before the Court. The Official Assignee's appeal was partially upheld, and costs were awarded accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sun, 31 Aug 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279753