https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279752 The Supreme Court ruled that the tenancy created by the mortgagee in possession did not survive the termination of the mortgagee interest and was not binding on the purchaser. The tenants were not protected by the Rent Restriction Act as the tenancy ceased with the mortgagee's interest termination upon full mortgage payment by the purchaser. The Court determined mesne profits to be limited to the actual rent paid for the premises. The Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the lower court's decision on all issues and ordering costs to be set off with the resulting difference payable. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279752 The Supreme Court ruled that the tenancy created by the mortgagee in possession did not survive the termination of the mortgagee interest and was not binding on the purchaser. The tenants were not protected by the Rent Restriction Act as the tenancy ceased with the mortgagee's interest termination upon full mortgage payment by the purchaser. The Court determined mesne profits to be limited to the actual rent paid for the premises. The Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the lower court's decision on all issues and ordering costs to be set off with the resulting difference payable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279752