<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Upheld: Loan Repayment by Cheques Not a Valid Excuse for Violating Section 269SS. No Black Money Defense.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45664</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271D - The mere proof that the loans were repaid through cheques and there was no attempt to induct black money into the business, itself cannot be considered as a reasonable cause or as a compelling circumstance under which the mandate of Section 269SS can be violated -penalty upheld</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:21:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:21:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Upheld: Loan Repayment by Cheques Not a Valid Excuse for Violating Section 269SS. No Black Money Defense.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45664</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271D - The mere proof that the loans were repaid through cheques and there was no attempt to induct black money into the business, itself cannot be considered as a reasonable cause or as a compelling circumstance under which the mandate of Section 269SS can be violated -penalty upheld</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:21:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>