<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 293 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377849</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the appellant failed to establish a valid explanation or reasonable cause for accepting cash loans, as mandated by Section 273B. Merely repaying the loans via cheques and absence of tax evasion were deemed insufficient to justify accepting the loans in cash. The appeal was dismissed, ruling in favor of the revenue authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 293 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377849</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the appellant failed to establish a valid explanation or reasonable cause for accepting cash loans, as mandated by Section 273B. Merely repaying the loans via cheques and absence of tax evasion were deemed insufficient to justify accepting the loans in cash. The appeal was dismissed, ruling in favor of the revenue authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>