<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Director Prosecuted After 280-Day Delay in Appeal Due to Small Penalty Amount; Reasonable Cause Accepted u/ss 276/277.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45668</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay of 280 days - not filed appeal against penalty being smallness of the amount - revenue has started prosecution of the Director by issuing notice u/s 276/277 - The assessee acted on the advice his tax advisor keeping in view the cost of litigation, which in our view is a reasonable cause</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:20:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:20:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Director Prosecuted After 280-Day Delay in Appeal Due to Small Penalty Amount; Reasonable Cause Accepted u/ss 276/277.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45668</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay of 280 days - not filed appeal against penalty being smallness of the amount - revenue has started prosecution of the Director by issuing notice u/s 276/277 - The assessee acted on the advice his tax advisor keeping in view the cost of litigation, which in our view is a reasonable cause</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:20:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>