<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 275 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377831</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the payment for fabric testing to a Spanish company did not constitute &#039;Fee for Technical Services&#039; under the India-Spain Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. As a result, Section 195 of the Income-tax Act was deemed inapplicable, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The decision emphasized the importance of treaty provisions and judicial precedents in determining tax liabilities for international transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 275 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377831</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the payment for fabric testing to a Spanish company did not constitute &#039;Fee for Technical Services&#039; under the India-Spain Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. As a result, Section 195 of the Income-tax Act was deemed inapplicable, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The decision emphasized the importance of treaty provisions and judicial precedents in determining tax liabilities for international transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>