<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 271 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377827</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and allowed the appeal, determining that the interest on Fixed Deposits (FDs) did not form part of the assessable income for the relevant assessment year. It was found that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest as the Assessing Officer had appropriately considered the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 271 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377827</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and allowed the appeal, determining that the interest on Fixed Deposits (FDs) did not form part of the assessable income for the relevant assessment year. It was found that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest as the Assessing Officer had appropriately considered the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>