https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377824 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the Ld. CIT(A)'s order and directing the AO to review the accrued interest computation. The Tribunal suggested accepting the consistent methodology of the appellant, verified by auditors, and limited the addition to the net difference over FYs 2009-10 to 2013-14. The discrepancy was attributed to variances in methodologies, not understating income, leading to a revised addition of Rs. 1,18,734. en-us Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377824 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the Ld. CIT(A)'s order and directing the AO to review the accrued interest computation. The Tribunal suggested accepting the consistent methodology of the appellant, verified by auditors, and limited the addition to the net difference over FYs 2009-10 to 2013-14. The discrepancy was attributed to variances in methodologies, not understating income, leading to a revised addition of Rs. 1,18,734. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377824