<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 261 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of additions concerning marketing expenses on Free of Cost (FOC) handsets and closing stock due to handsets damaged in transit. The Tribunal relied on the precedent set in the assessee&#039;s own case and emphasized the principles of materiality and revenue neutrality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:19:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 261 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of additions concerning marketing expenses on Free of Cost (FOC) handsets and closing stock due to handsets damaged in transit. The Tribunal relied on the precedent set in the assessee&#039;s own case and emphasized the principles of materiality and revenue neutrality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>