<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 255 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377811</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. It upheld the appellant&#039;s eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 4/2006-CE for imported marble slabs and set aside the Revenue&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed the less charge demand notices as time-barred due to improper service to the appellant, ultimately allowing the appeals solely on the grounds of limitation without delving into the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 255 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377811</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. It upheld the appellant&#039;s eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 4/2006-CE for imported marble slabs and set aside the Revenue&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed the less charge demand notices as time-barred due to improper service to the appellant, ultimately allowing the appeals solely on the grounds of limitation without delving into the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>