<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 250 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377806</link>
    <description>The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 operates in a distinct field directed at proceeds of crime and its attachment and confiscation scheme is not displaced by the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, the Securitisation Act, or the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. A bona fide third-party secured creditor may resist attachment where the interest is lawfully created, acquired in good faith, and supported by due diligence, but the claim depends on the chronology, value, and absence of complicity. Equivalent-value assets may be attached under the money-laundering statute, yet competing security interests require fact-specific scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 17:35:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 250 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377806</link>
      <description>The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 operates in a distinct field directed at proceeds of crime and its attachment and confiscation scheme is not displaced by the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, the Securitisation Act, or the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. A bona fide third-party secured creditor may resist attachment where the interest is lawfully created, acquired in good faith, and supported by due diligence, but the claim depends on the chronology, value, and absence of complicity. Equivalent-value assets may be attached under the money-laundering statute, yet competing security interests require fact-specific scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>