https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377801 The court dismissed the writ petitions as it found no merit in the petitioner's claims regarding the respondent's liability to bear the additional service tax under the contract. The court emphasized the importance of resolving contractual disputes through arbitration or mutual agreement and highlighted that without explicit contractual provisions, it could not alter the terms to impose the service tax liability on the respondent. en-us Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377801 The court dismissed the writ petitions as it found no merit in the petitioner's claims regarding the respondent's liability to bear the additional service tax under the contract. The court emphasized the importance of resolving contractual disputes through arbitration or mutual agreement and highlighted that without explicit contractual provisions, it could not alter the terms to impose the service tax liability on the respondent. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377801