https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377799 The Tribunal ruled in a case involving various service tax issues. The demand for Service Tax on Club/Association was set aside. Service Tax on Mandap Keeper was limited to separate banquet/conference hall rentals. Service Tax on Business Auxiliary Service was upheld. Service Tax on Beauty Treatment, Health and Fitness Centre, Dry Cleaning, and Internet Caf'e is to be re-computed with cum-duty benefit. Penalties under Sections 76 and 78 cannot be imposed simultaneously. Penalty under Section 76 was set aside, while penalties under Sections 77 and 78 were upheld. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377799 The Tribunal ruled in a case involving various service tax issues. The demand for Service Tax on Club/Association was set aside. Service Tax on Mandap Keeper was limited to separate banquet/conference hall rentals. Service Tax on Business Auxiliary Service was upheld. Service Tax on Beauty Treatment, Health and Fitness Centre, Dry Cleaning, and Internet Caf'e is to be re-computed with cum-duty benefit. Penalties under Sections 76 and 78 cannot be imposed simultaneously. Penalty under Section 76 was set aside, while penalties under Sections 77 and 78 were upheld. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377799