<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 59 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17548</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that pontoons used for construction purposes did not qualify as &quot;ships&quot; under section 33 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for claiming development rebate. The court emphasized that the term &quot;ship&quot; encompasses vessels used in navigation, involving the conveyance of goods and individuals through water. Pontoons, primarily serving as construction platforms in water, were distinguished from traditional vessels that navigate between points. Despite a previous Gujarat High Court judgment considering pontoons as ships under Income-tax Rules, the High Court held that such a broad interpretation did not apply to the Income-tax Act, ultimately denying the assessee&#039;s claim for a higher development rebate rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:13:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 59 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17548</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that pontoons used for construction purposes did not qualify as &quot;ships&quot; under section 33 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for claiming development rebate. The court emphasized that the term &quot;ship&quot; encompasses vessels used in navigation, involving the conveyance of goods and individuals through water. Pontoons, primarily serving as construction platforms in water, were distinguished from traditional vessels that navigate between points. Despite a previous Gujarat High Court judgment considering pontoons as ships under Income-tax Rules, the High Court held that such a broad interpretation did not apply to the Income-tax Act, ultimately denying the assessee&#039;s claim for a higher development rebate rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>