https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377790 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of the rectification application under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. It held that the rectification process is limited to correcting obvious errors and cannot be used to re-evaluate settled matters. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking writ relief and allowed for an appeal within a specified period. The decision was based on the respondent's detailed reasoning in the impugned order, affirming the validity of the rejection. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:37:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377790 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of the rectification application under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. It held that the rectification process is limited to correcting obvious errors and cannot be used to re-evaluate settled matters. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking writ relief and allowed for an appeal within a specified period. The decision was based on the respondent's detailed reasoning in the impugned order, affirming the validity of the rejection. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377790