https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279750 In wilful defaulter proceedings, the High Court held that Article 226 interference was not warranted at the show-cause stage because the Committee had not yet taken a final decision on the representation. The petitioners had already been given hearing opportunities, with adjournments also sought, and the question of supplying documents was left to the Committee to consider while deciding the representation. The request to appear through counsel was likewise treated as a matter for the Committee's consideration under the applicable legal position. The petitioners were left to pursue their representation before the Committee. en-us Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:34:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279750 In wilful defaulter proceedings, the High Court held that Article 226 interference was not warranted at the show-cause stage because the Committee had not yet taken a final decision on the representation. The petitioners had already been given hearing opportunities, with adjournments also sought, and the question of supplying documents was left to the Committee to consider while deciding the representation. The request to appear through counsel was likewise treated as a matter for the Committee's consideration under the applicable legal position. The petitioners were left to pursue their representation before the Committee. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279750