<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1488 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279750</link>
    <description>The Court emphasized that the petitioners, a company and its director, must appear before the Committee as scheduled to pursue their representation regarding the demanded documents related to the show-cause notice from a government-owned public sector bank. The Court disposed of the petition, noting that the petitioners&#039; request to appear through an Advocate should be considered by the Committee in accordance with a Delhi High Court judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:34:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1488 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279750</link>
      <description>The Court emphasized that the petitioners, a company and its director, must appear before the Committee as scheduled to pursue their representation regarding the demanded documents related to the show-cause notice from a government-owned public sector bank. The Court disposed of the petition, noting that the petitioners&#039; request to appear through an Advocate should be considered by the Committee in accordance with a Delhi High Court judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>