<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Enforcing One-Sided Contracts in Builder-Buyer Agreements, Protecting Consumer Rights in Real Estate Deals.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45672</link>
    <description>Consumer protection - validity of one-sided agreement between the builder and buyer - right of buyer of flat in case of default committed by the builder / developer - The Appellant–Builder could not seek to bind the Respondent with such one-sided contractual terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:27:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:27:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Enforcing One-Sided Contracts in Builder-Buyer Agreements, Protecting Consumer Rights in Real Estate Deals.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45672</link>
      <description>Consumer protection - validity of one-sided agreement between the builder and buyer - right of buyer of flat in case of default committed by the builder / developer - The Appellant–Builder could not seek to bind the Respondent with such one-sided contractual terms.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:27:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>