<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 229 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377785</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the lower forums&#039; decisions. The case underscored the significance of complying with pre-installation conditions, absence of commitment to extra features, and the need for an Online UPS for uninterrupted power supply. The manufacturer&#039;s communication did not alter the specified conditions, resulting in the rejection of claims of service deficiency or restrictive trade practice by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 229 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377785</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the lower forums&#039; decisions. The case underscored the significance of complying with pre-installation conditions, absence of commitment to extra features, and the need for an Online UPS for uninterrupted power supply. The manufacturer&#039;s communication did not alter the specified conditions, resulting in the rejection of claims of service deficiency or restrictive trade practice by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>