<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1102 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279740</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions in a case involving the redemption of disputed land. The 99-year mortgage period was considered a clog on the equity of redemption, deemed oppressive due to the financial circumstances of the mortgagor. The plaintiff was found to have the right to redeem the property despite purchasing only part of the mortgaged land. The appeal was dismissed without costs, affirming the plaintiff&#039;s entitlement to redeem the property before the stipulated mortgage period expired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 18:27:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1102 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279740</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions in a case involving the redemption of disputed land. The 99-year mortgage period was considered a clog on the equity of redemption, deemed oppressive due to the financial circumstances of the mortgagor. The plaintiff was found to have the right to redeem the property despite purchasing only part of the mortgaged land. The appeal was dismissed without costs, affirming the plaintiff&#039;s entitlement to redeem the property before the stipulated mortgage period expired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>