<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 222 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377778</link>
    <description>Departmental appeal was not pressed because the tax effect fell within the CBDT Instruction No. 3 of 2018, as amended, which provides for withdrawal or non-prosecution of appeals below the prescribed monetary threshold. The Department&#039;s counsel stated that the appeal would not be pressed, and the Court recorded that statement and disposed of the matter on that basis. All questions of law were expressly left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 222 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377778</link>
      <description>Departmental appeal was not pressed because the tax effect fell within the CBDT Instruction No. 3 of 2018, as amended, which provides for withdrawal or non-prosecution of appeals below the prescribed monetary threshold. The Department&#039;s counsel stated that the appeal would not be pressed, and the Court recorded that statement and disposed of the matter on that basis. All questions of law were expressly left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>