<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 42 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17540</link>
    <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the entire sale proceeds as income due to undisclosed purchases, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The Court emphasized the necessity of income preceding expenditure and deemed the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning erroneous and unsustainable. The judgment was forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:56:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 42 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17540</link>
      <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the entire sale proceeds as income due to undisclosed purchases, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The Court emphasized the necessity of income preceding expenditure and deemed the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning erroneous and unsustainable. The judgment was forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>