<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 211 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2007-08. The penalty was deleted as the assessee had disclosed all necessary facts, and there was no concealment of income. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and the issue regarding the validity of the notice under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) was deemed academic and not discussed further.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 211 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2007-08. The penalty was deleted as the assessee had disclosed all necessary facts, and there was no concealment of income. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and the issue regarding the validity of the notice under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) was deemed academic and not discussed further.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>