<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 205 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty order invalid due to lack of specificity in the notice and the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to clearly establish the nature of the default. The penalty proceedings were deemed flawed, lacking proper application of legal standards. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty order was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 07:09:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 205 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty order invalid due to lack of specificity in the notice and the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to clearly establish the nature of the default. The penalty proceedings were deemed flawed, lacking proper application of legal standards. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty order was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>